Difference between revisions of "WikiCMS"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Arguments against using a Wiki as a CMS = | = Arguments against using a Wiki as a CMS = | ||
# Anyone can edit it | # Anyone can edit it | ||
| + | # No workflow | ||
| + | # No approval method built into the wiki | ||
= Example = | = Example = | ||
* Internal Link: {{Link|target=Ion2017-07-18}} | * Internal Link: {{Link|target=Ion2017-07-18}} | ||
Revision as of 16:10, 7 August 2017
Arguments against using a Wiki as a CMS
- Anyone can edit it
- No workflow
- No approval method built into the wiki
Example
- Internal Link: Ion2017-07-18
- External Link: http://www.profiwiki.de/index.php/Ion2017-07-18
Challenges
Private Information could leak if people malicously add the frontend category to a private page